<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Peter Peacock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterpeacock.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterpeacock.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The news blog of Peter Peacock MSP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on About Peter Peacock by dennis glanville</title>
		<link>http://peterpeacock.wordpress.com/about/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis glanville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,
after reading about the level crossing accident,would it not be possible
to install TWO sets of barriers, one further back than the other then if
they go through the first the first barrier, then there is a chance that they
will not go through the main barrier
It makes a bit of sence if it is thought out.

denglan81@ntlworld.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,<br />
after reading about the level crossing accident,would it not be possible<br />
to install TWO sets of barriers, one further back than the other then if<br />
they go through the first the first barrier, then there is a chance that they<br />
will not go through the main barrier<br />
It makes a bit of sence if it is thought out.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:denglan81@ntlworld.com">denglan81@ntlworld.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
